Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/10/2013 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    http://www.cracked.com/video_18389_a-message-to-guys-who-comment-internet-videos.html this doesn't apply to just videos you're making a fucking scumbag asshole out of yourselves for the whole wide world to see grow the fuck up
  2. 1 point
    DeathscytheX

    Playstation 4 to cost $430!?

    I think going digital is a must. This will kill the need to worry about backwards compatibility. XBL and PS could replicate what Steam does so you keep your games on that network throughout the rest of the generations. The costs of packaging and producing discs would save millions in production costs. This could also pave way from something new. Cross console gaming. We saw that it could be done between PS3 and Steam when Portal 2 came out. It def could be done with other games. It would be a very limited amount of games that wouldn't have hardware conflicts between how the game is played. If MS Illumiroom gives xbox players a better advantage or the touch screen on PS4's controller does, then it wouldn't be worth making the game crossplatform. Maybe bring the console wars to a new level? Have just specific events, like a Team Xbox vs. Team PS weekend in COD. Instead of DLC timed exclusives being decided by corporate dollars, let it be decided by the gaming community. Which ever side wins the event gets the DLC early release.
  3. 1 point
    Back in the day science in comics was kinda: ''make it up if it sounds like it could make sense'' If it actually weighed that, it would probably fall to the centre of the planet if he ever put it down ;p
  4. 1 point
    Kite

    Playstation 4 to cost $430!?

    My 2 cents on the next gen of consoles I bet the next gen will really push for digital purchasing over there network, with current home BB being faster then ever, a new console launch could be the catalyst needed to shift the market, to make this the norm, With cloud becoming more reliable, more and more data canbe held on a server with lil to no lag Ps2 gave birth to DvD, Ps3 gave us BluRay, XB360 made multi player a more important factor in gaming All these features existed before the consoles, but the consoles have a very strong influence I hope next gen has backward compatibility The price seems decent however, would make sense as Bluray RnD would have been under ps3's overheads, extra ram, and processors are not that expensive compared to the development of new tech
  5. 1 point
    DeathscytheX

    Playstation 4 to cost $430!?

    You'll never see a free xbox live that allows players to play multilayer for free, and honestly rightfully so. The difference between playing online on PS3 and on Xbox 360 is night and day. I use to scoff at paying for an online service when I only had a PS3, but the service offered by XBL is vastly superior. You get what you pay for. XBL has paved the way for quality online gaming from its private chat/party chat system to its online store that offered free demo's for games years before PS Plus ever came out. Cheating is less prevalent, and those reported and caught are either banned for life, or their gamertag is branded as a cheater for the rest of their days. While paying $10 for an online pass sounds like a good idea, for people that buy 20 games a year, its not very practical when you could pay $60 a year rather than $200. XBL has made a pretty effective tiered payment program where you can pay yearly, every 6 months, tri-monthly, or monthly. Paying monthly costs as much as netflix instant stream but you end up paying $30 more a year that way. The online pass was created to recoup money off used game sales, which by all indications, seems to be coming to an end this generation. Both Sony and MS seem to be coming up with some way to prevent consoles from playing used games. I have no idea how this will work, but if my theories on how they will accomplish this are accurate, I do not like it. I personally don't buy used games anymore because its just a rip off. $5-10 off for a used copy isn't for me. I'm just wondering if it will hurt redbox's game rental abilities.
  6. 1 point
    Myk JL

    Playstation 4 to cost $430!?

    I think PS Home 2 would not only have to have a major graphics & avatar improvements but a way to use PS Home Avatars in other games. I still think its a major disappointment that my PS Home Avatar dressed as a Ghost Buster Can't appear driving in The Ambulance Shown in the new Twisted Metal on the PS3. Or even as an option in Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale. Had they done that there be more reason to buy (Sony Exclusive) games & be on PS Home.
  7. 1 point
    Myk JL

    Playstation 4 to cost $430!?

    In the case that PS4 has PS Home 2 it ultimately confirms the fact that I shouldn't have spent thousands on PSN. However since Sony is trying to transfer all PS Home save data from the PS3s to PSN, PS Home 2 isn't planned anytime soon. In full honesty I bought my PS3 mainly as a Blu-Ray Player. However it eventually replaced my Wii which I had first at the time. About 2 years later I stopped watching Blu-Ray Movies because Sony created Video Unlimited. Then about half a year later I felt justified in selling the majority of games I owned once PS Plus started to get *free games. In the case however that Sony starts to charge for online like Microsoft I honestly welcome it. One of the major problems of home have been the trolls who refuse to pay for anything. They're just there for free rewards & if they find out anything cost (too much) money it is ultimately a scam to them. Or in the case of items such as a $15 Gold Suit "Class Warfare". A bogus claim since the PS3 costs hundreds more. Even when a company like Granzella gives a free option to play their Home Games rather than be thankful that they can play they still consider the paid for items a scam. On the other hand the One time fee access & what not I guess I could agree with Jim Sterling on that matter. http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/jimquisition/6755-Breaking-the-Bones-of-Business Okay that rant is long enough but hopefully it summed up my thoughts. *Free as in when the games come available for purchase for free. Once you miss out on that you would have to buy them if you really want them. However they're not technically free since you need to stay subscribed to PS Plus to play them. Still $50 a year vs the hundreds all of these games would have cost together is a decent bargain.
  8. 1 point
    Kite

    The Walking Dead Season 3

    personally i would head to the coast preferable for a very large yacht or small cruise ship, zombies cant swim and plenty of fish to eat, also sea air should increase decomposition of the walkers making them slower and go into a dessicated state sooner season 2 was a chore to watch, great drama, and suspense, but didnt feel like a zombie show Season 1 was truly awesome, it felt like the world had ended, seeing LA deserted and 1000's of walkers was crazy for a TV show s3, again feels more localised like s2, which makes set from a filming stand point, but way better then s2,
  9. 1 point
    It was tripping me out because they drive on the opposite side of the road, so every time a car would come around the curve I thought he was about to get hit.
  10. 1 point
    After reading: http://kotaku.com/5968952/the-knights-of-new-vegas-how-obsidian-survived-countless-catastrophes-and-made-some-of-the-coolest-role+playing-games-ever I fully understand how KOTOR II got screwed over by time constraints. I'd like to see Obsidian get another shot at this.
  11. 1 point
    Sledgstone

    Superman Unbound

    You mean "Superman/Batman: Apocalypse" That is the best movie DC comics has made. I loved the ending.. just when you thought the movie was over you get the most epic fight ever.
  12. 1 point
    Wow so true. I laughed pretty hard because of how sadly accurate that video is. Its amazing how people can act when they are veiled by internet anonymity. Chances are presented with a real world situation these same people would not spew these vulgar sexist and/or hateful comments in fear of getting punched in the face, or not even that, the fact that they'd be looked down upon for their socially unacceptable behavior. There is no room for a civil debate or even a practical discussion on youtube, or any article on the gawker network. What little youtube videos I have are game play to share with friends. I turn comments and voting off just because I don't have time for trolls.
  13. 1 point
    Ladywriter

    Give that woman a gun

    I consider myself Progressive in my politics, sometimes my views are liberal views, sometimes they're more conservative. When it comes to guns I lean to the right, seemingly out of character for me as most of my friends and fam would consider me a liberal. Sorry, but neither side has me brainwashed, I think for myself. Gun ownership is a right. Gun collectors, just like action figure collectors, can choose what they want to have in their collection. Background checks are necessary to keep guns from violent felons. A safety course should be part of the purchasing process for all guns including range time. I think 10 round clips is a satisfactory compromise. I can't get down with either side because I'm in the middle where shit actually makes sense..... Anyway Today I saw this A woman raises a knife and shouts slogans against Egyptian Islamist President Mohamed Mursi and members of the Muslim Brotherhood during a march against sexual harassment and violence against women in Cairo February 6, 2013. The rally come... and the first thing that popped into my head was give that woman a gun. Terrible? Women are more often on the receiving end of gun violence, I know. Our culture ties guns to masculinity. Our culture ties guns to killing animals and people. It's unfortunate because it turns women off to gun ownership. Not every gun owner hunts, they shoot at targets only. Not every gun owner hunts for sport, what they kill feeds their family. Nor is every gun owner a man. It gets me to wondering what if it were just as likely that the woman next to you in line had a gun as the guy next to her? What if there was a 50% chance the old lady in the park had a gun under her coat? What if it was equally likely she/he was packing heat? Not only that, but what if it were equally likely the woman with the gun would use it to defend herself? What if we lived in a reality where she was just as potentially deadly as he? I'm not saying the gun is the almighty equalizer, not at all. Any weapon you have can be taken and used against you if the fight goes south on you. I am saying female gun owners should stop being portrayed as sexy oddities or heartless bitches and start being normalized. We need to stop scaring women away from guns with caveman chest thumping and grunting.
  14. 1 point
    DeathscytheX

    Give that woman a gun

    There are plenty of women out there that could out shoot male shooters any day of the week. Glock employees a lot of them on their shooting teams. Of course some of them are held as "sexy oddities" because they are attractive, and they indulge their 'fans' likewise. The perception of women shooting guns has shifted over the years... a little slower than it should have. But as far as the retail market goes, Manufacturers like Glock, Ruger, Kimber, Bersa, Smith & Wesson, and Taurus have designed small concealable pistols that can easily fit into purses, concealed body hostlers, or simply in a pocket. They've definitely come a long way from the 2 shot derringer that has terrible accuracy. I know 3 of my female friends that carry. Grandma may not be able to handle a .45 but that .380 or 9mm in hollow point will take any man down, especially with 6-10 shots in the mag. With all the crazies and rapists out there, sometimes mace or tasers just wont cut it. I've seen videos of people hyped up on some bad shit and 3 cops not able to bring him down with tasers. That crazy ex-husband may not care about a restraining order, or that homeless guy desperate for the pills that landed him there may lurk in the corner eyeballing that purse. It shouldn't be socially weird that a women or the elderly carry, they are both viewed as "easy targets" for sick people looking for a victim. Sometimes just pointing a piece at an unsuspecting foe is enough to get them to back off... if they don't? Their demise is a result of their own foolishness. I carry because I like to target shoot, and because of dumbshits that can't drive, don't follow the rules of the road, and then act like you are in the wrong when they perceived that you have wronged them. I don't do road rage, and ill drop anyone that thinks they need to get out of their vehicle to assault me because I didn't let them in front of me when they broke the law in trying to do so in the first place. A few favorite stories of the week. Elderly: http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/man-shot-near-martin-luther-king-jr-high-school-in-detroit Woman: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57562397-504083/georgia-mother-hides-children-shoots-intruder-5-times-during-home-invasion-police-say/ Physically disabled: http://www.easybakegunclub.com/news/2814/Disabled-veteran-scares-off-intruder-with-9mm-%28Geo.html#.URbnh2dZN8F
  15. 1 point
    Pchan

    Battlestar Galactica Blood and Chrome

    Yeah, I watched the webisodes, DAMN GOOD stuff. Shows like this need to still be on air or need to get picked by the network. Stupid networks.


×
×
  • Create New...