Ladywriter 7,783 Report post Posted June 28, 2010 Justices rebuff Chicago, which defended ban as reasonable exercise of local power WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Monday that the Constitution's "right to keep and bear arms" applies nationwide as a restraint on the ability of the federal, state and local governments to substantially limit its reach. By a 5-4 vote split along familiar ideological lines, the nation's highest court extended its landmark 2008 ruling that individual Americans have a constitutional right to own guns to all the cities and states for the first time. In doing so, the justices signaled that less severe restrictions could survive legal challenges. The ruling involved a 28-year-old handgun ban in the Chicago area. The ruling was a victory for four Chicago-area residents, two gun rights groups and the politically powerful National Rifle Association. It was a defeat for Chicago, which defended its ban as a reasonable exercise of local power to protect public safety. The law and a similar handgun ban in suburban Oak Park, Ill., were the nation's most restrictive gun control measures. Monday's decision did not explicitly strike down the Chicago area laws, ordering a federal appeals court to reconsider its ruling. It left little doubt, however, that they would fall eventually. outta my cold dead hand..... 1 DeathscytheX reacted to this Look at the flowers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Myk JL 1,731 Report post Posted June 28, 2010 If only they'd remove all gun bans. Those who fight deplorables should see to it that they themselves do not become deplorables. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DeathscytheX 9,732 Report post Posted June 28, 2010 Crime is horrendous in Chicago. People still get guns illegally. Let the citizens defend themselves. GET A NEW FUNK ON BEFORE YOU GET DUMPED ON! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dubird 6,815 Report post Posted June 28, 2010 yeah, that's one thing these lawmakers seem to forget....guns are easy to obtain illegally, so if you ban all guns, regular citizins won't have protection....i do agree with gun control, which does help keep guns out of the hands of SOME of the people that would abuse it, but it's still perfectly possible to get a gun of some kind for personal protection....if someone wants to use a gun to commit a crime, most of the criminals will opt for an illegal one that's harder to trace anyways..... Yesterday was the deadline for all complaints! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kite 3,263 Report post Posted June 29, 2010 in a nation born from guns, you cant remove guns once there there. Though i dont believe in guns, I believe 100% it would have been far better if there was no guns in the 1st place, so no one had them. If i lived in the USA i would own a gun. I wish the UK would allow us to defend our homes, you cant in the UK, pull a Knife on someone breaking into your home, you face jail time. (unless you go before a Jury, as no jury would convict a person defending their home and family) Bruce Campbell: '' This place has more security then the Batcave '' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites