Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Ladywriter

This summer may see first ice-free North Pole

3 posts in this topic

article

WASHINGTON - There’s a 50-50 chance that the North Pole will be ice-free this summer, which would be a first in recorded history, a leading ice scientist says.The weather and ocean conditions in the next couple of weeks will determine how much of the sea ice will melt, and early signs are not good, said Mark Serreze. He’s a senior researcher at the National Snow and Ice Data Center and the University of Colorado in Boulder, Colo.

The chances for a total meltdown at the pole are higher than ever because the layer of ice coating the sea is thinner than ever, he said.

“A large area at the North Pole and surrounding the North Pole is first-year ice,” Serreze said. “That’s the stuff that tends to melt out in the summer because it’s thin.”

Record ice melt

Preliminary February and March data from a NASA satellite shows that the circle of ice surrounding the North Pole is “considerably thinner” than scientists have seen during the five years the satellite has been taking pictures, NASA ice scientist Jay Zwally said Friday. He thinks there is slightly less than a 50-50 chance the North Pole will be ice-free.

Last year was a record year for ice melt all over the Arctic and the ice band surrounding the North Pole is even thinner now.

There is nothing scientifically significant about the North Pole, Serreze said. But there is a cultural and symbolic importance. It’s home to Santa Claus, after all. Last August, the Northwest Passage was open to navigation for the first time in memory.

A more conservative ice scientist, Cecilia Bitz at the University of Washington, put the odds of a North Pole without ice closer to 1 in 4. Even that is far worse than climate models had predicted, which was 1 in 70 sometime in the next decade, she said.

But both she and Serreze agree it’s just a matter of time.

Warming climate partly to blame

“I would guess within the next 10 years it would happen at least once,” Bitz said.

Already, figures from the National Snow and Ice Data Center show sea ice in the Arctic as a whole at about the same level now as it was at its low point last year in late June and early July.

The explanation is a warming climate and a weather phenomenon, scientists said.

For the last couple of decades, there has been a steady melt of Arctic sea ice — which covers only the ocean and which thins during summer and refreezes in winter. In recent years, it has gradually become thinner because more of it has been melting as the Earth’s temperature rises.

Then, this past winter, there was a natural weather shift called the Arctic Oscillation, sort of a cold weather cousin to El Nino. That oscillation caused a change in winds and ocean that accelerated a normal flushing of sea ice in the Arctic. That pushed the older thicker sea ice that had been over the North Pole south toward Greenland and eventually out of the Arctic, Serreze said. That left just a thin one-year layer of ice that previously covered part of Siberia.


                                               gallery_3_22_21209.jpg

                                               Look at the flowers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


So... at what point will major flooding happen?...


"Cool. I always knew Atheists would someday save The World."

- Fantomex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The melting of the North Pole sucks hardcore for polar bears (we need to be doing more to help the poor guys out). But in relation to humans, the melting of the North Pole doesn't have specific consequences. This is because the ice at the North Pole is floating, not glacial. Greenland's glacial ice is melting. . . that has a negative effect on sea levels. When Greenland's glacial ice melts 100%; 60% of the state of Florida, most of Louisiana, and parts of Texas (such as Houston) will be underwater.

I ain't no scientist, so I could be completely wrong. I'm just repeating what we discussed in class this morning. . . . But I'm pretty sure about how the North Pole will not raise sea levels when it melts. My teacher said you can prove it by filling a glass with water, measure the height of the water in inches or centimeters. Put an ice cube (I don't think the number of cubes matters) in the glass of water. Wait for the ice to melt and when it completely melts, measure the water again. The melted ice adds no height or volume to the already existing water and the measurement does not change. Therefore, floating ice doesn't raise sea levels. It's actually a pretty cool experiment to do when you're bored.

But the melting of the North Pole and other polar ice shouldn't be taken lightly. Besides the devastating effects it will have on the already short-numbered polar bear population, it symbolizes just how badly we've fucked up this planet.:(

SAVE THE POLAR BEARS!!!!! Well, and the rest of the planet.:oops:

Edited by Zepling
Spelling

Mayor Quimby: I'll admit I used the city treasury to fund the murder of my enemies, but as Gabbo would say, I'm a bad wittle boy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0